The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled that creditors can only take possession of collateral properties used to secure loans, not full ownership, unless a negotiated settlement is agreed upon. This decision clarifies lenders' rights while protecting borrowers from unfair practices.
CREDITORS may take possession of properties used as collateral for loans, but not full ownership, unless the transaction is agreed upon by both parties as a negotiated settlement for the outstanding loan, according to a recent Supreme Court ruling.The decision, penned by Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo, clarified lenders' rights over collateral properties while reinforcing protection for borrowers under Philippine law.The case involved Ruby Shelter Builders and Realty Development Corp.
, which borrowed P95 million from creditors Romeo Tan and Roberto Obiedo. Ruby Shelter listed several properties as collateral for its loan.As its outstanding debt grew, Ruby Shelter entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with Tan and Obiedo, which gave the company more time to repay the loan.The MOA stipulated that, in the event of a loan default, Tan and Obiedo can register deeds of absolute sale to transfer ownership of the collateral properties to themselves.Ruby Shelter also agreed to sell its properties for P5 million as part of the deal.However, when the parties failed to agree on the loan settlement terms, Tan and Obiedo notarized the deeds of sale prematurely, prompting Ruby Shelter to file a complaint in the Regional Trial Court (RTC).The company argued that the deeds were invalid and violated the prohibition against pactum commissorium, a provision in Article 2088 of the Civil Code. Pactum commissorium is an agreement that automatically transfers ownership of a collateral to the lender in case of default, a practice prohibited by law to prevent borrowers from losing assets worth more than their debts.The RTC initially ruled in favor of Ruby Shelter, asserting that the deeds of sale constituted a prohibited pactum commissorium.However, the Court of Appeals (CA) reversed the decision, siding with Tan and Obiedo and upholding the RTC's rulin
CREDITORS LOAN COLLATERAL SUPREME COURT PHILIPPINE LAW PACTUM COMMISSORIUM
Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Court denies TikTok's request to halt enforcement of potential US ban until Supreme Court reviewA federal appeals court on Friday left in place a mid-January deadline in a federal law requiring TikTok to be sold or face a ban in the United States, rejecting a request made by the company to halt enforcement until the Supreme Court reviews its challenge of the statute.
Read more »
Supreme Court Seeks to Uphold Tennessee's Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for MinorsDuring a hearing, the Supreme Court seemed likely to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, with conservative justices showing skepticism of arguments against the ban. The case's outcome could sway similar laws across the nation.
Read more »
Transgender rights case lands at Supreme Court amid debate over ban on medical treatments for minorsWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is hearing arguments Wednesday in just its second major transgender rights case, which is a challenge to a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for minors.
Read more »
Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Intellectual Disability Witness TestimonyThe Supreme Court has affirmed the conviction of two men for murder based on the testimony of a witness with intellectual disabilities. The ruling emphasizes that a person's intellectual disability does not automatically disqualify them from being a credible witness in court if their testimony is coherent.
Read more »
US appeals court upholds TikTok law forcing its saleTikTok plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court
Read more »
Supreme Court: Disclosure of bar exam results requires examinee’s consentThe Supreme Court (SC) said on Monday that the Bar examination scores cannot be disclosed without the prior consent of the examinees as these are
Read more »