Court of Appeals Rules Musicians Must Prove Claims for Royalties

Law News

Court of Appeals Rules Musicians Must Prove Claims for Royalties
MUSIC RIGHTSCOPYRIGHTROYALTY
  • 📰 manilabulletin
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 86 sec. here
  • 9 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 59%
  • Publisher: 51%

The Court of Appeals (CA) emphasized that while the judicial system protects musicians' rights to their artistic creations, this protection is not automatic and requires proof of entitlement. In a recent decision, the CA upheld the lower court's ruling in favor of Raven Broadcasting Corporation (RBC), denying the appeal of the Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. (FILSCAP). The CA stated that musicians seeking royalties or other fees must present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Rey G. PanaliganWhile the country’s judicial system safeguards the rights of musicians for their artistic creations, “the protection is neither automatic nor unconditional,” the Court of Appeals declared.

FILSCAP is a non-stock, non-profit association of composers, lyricists, and music publishers that collectively enforces the public performance rights granted by law to copyright owners of musical works. RBC was granted a license for its radio station on March 27, 2017. For its online platform, it was granted a “Website License” covering the period from Jan. 1, 2017 to Dec.31, 2017, which will auto-renew annually unless a written termination notice is provided at least one month prior to expiration date. The license fee for the website was fixed at P33,600.00.12.

RBC denied financial liability. It said it has an existing license agreement with FILSCAP for the use of the songs of the artists for its radio business. But, it said, it has no financial obligation for its website license because it does not operate a business of hosting internet sites and does not stream music independently of its radio broadcasts.

The MeTC ruled that FILSCAP failed to submit as evidence the statements of account in relation to the demand letters dated June 15, 2018; July 25, 2018; Sept. 7, 2018; and the statement of accounts in connection with the final demand letter dated Oct. 4, 2018. “By sending a demand letter, the creditor places the debtor on notice that payment is due, default has already taken place, and a legal action may ensue if the debt is not settled.

“Based on the evidence, RBC was required to pay FILSCAP an annual license fee of P33,600 for its website. Records also reveal that RBC already paid a total of P91,483.40 as evidenced by receipts. FILSCAP was unable to prove that such amount did not cover the applicable license fee for its website, referenced as No. 17-1946.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

manilabulletin /  🏆 25. in PH

MUSIC RIGHTS COPYRIGHT ROYALTY FILSCAP COURT OF APPEALS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Court of Appeals Rules: Musicians Must Prove Entitlement to RoyaltiesCourt of Appeals Rules: Musicians Must Prove Entitlement to RoyaltiesThe Court of Appeals (CA) declared that while the judicial system safeguards the rights of musicians, “the protection is neither automatic nor unconditional.” The CA stated that musicians must prove their claims for royalties or other fees with sufficient evidence in a recent decision that denied the appeal of the Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. (FILSCAP) against a ruling in favor of Raven Broadcasting Corporation (RBC).
Read more »

Appeals court upholds verdict in Trump sexual abuse caseAppeals court upholds verdict in Trump sexual abuse caseNew York, United States - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury verdict ordering President-elect Donald Trump to pay $5 million for sexually
Read more »

Appeals Court Upholds Trump Verdict in Carroll Sex Abuse CaseAppeals Court Upholds Trump Verdict in Carroll Sex Abuse CaseA federal appeals court has upheld a jury verdict ordering former President Donald Trump to pay $5 million to writer E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation.
Read more »

Appeals Court Upholds Verdict in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case Against TrumpAppeals Court Upholds Verdict in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case Against TrumpA federal appeals court has upheld a jury verdict ordering former President Donald Trump to pay $5 million to writer E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation. Trump has vowed to appeal the decision further.
Read more »

Appeals Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Reinstated by Biden AdministrationAppeals Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Reinstated by Biden AdministrationA federal appeals court ruled that the Federal Communications Commission overstepped its authority by reinstating net neutrality policies, reversing a decision made under the Biden administration.
Read more »

Malaysia's Appeals Court Grants Najib Razak Access to Royal Order Potentially Enabling Home DetentionMalaysia's Appeals Court Grants Najib Razak Access to Royal Order Potentially Enabling Home DetentionFormer Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, convicted in the 1MDB scandal, received a significant legal victory as the appeals court granted his request to view a document he claims entitles him to house arrest. This decision, accompanied by confirmation from the royal palace, has reignited debate surrounding the legitimacy of the king's previous pardon decision and the possibility of Najib serving the remainder of his sentence at home.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-16 11:07:20