'This time, we can pursue a reform of the 1987 Constitution with only a singular goal in mind, and that is to improve the way we govern ourselves.' More in this Opinion piece:
Genuine proponents of constitutional reform must welcome the unequivocal declaration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. thatBecause now we can be confident, at least to a degree, that this effort can indeed be shielded from the typical toxic partisan politics which has scuttled every Cha-Cha attempt for the past 36 years. This time, we can pursue a reform of the 1987 Constitution with only a singular goal in mind, and that is to improve the way we govern ourselves.
It is truly unfortunate that we often see congressional hearings get overwhelmed by textbook debates between unitary-vs-federal or presidential-vs-parliamentary. We also see the discussion get flooded with arguments of “what is good for the country” which are solely based on academic literature. Well, we all know that these goals have not been achieved at all. The imposition of term limits has not curbed the appetite of politicians to consolidate political power by any means possible. In fact, by some cruel and perverse twist of fate, this purported anti-dynasty constitutional device has actually instigated the proliferation of bigger political dynasties.
Consequently, local governments almost exclusively prefer short-term, quick-gestation projects so that elected leaders can immediately reap the political returns. Strategic development undertakings that require an extended time frame almost always never see the light of day, even if it will produce more socio-economic benefits for the community.
One suggestion is to match the term of office of local officials to the president’s term of six years, but allowing for a single re-election. So, this provision can be amended such that the last part can read as follows, “…shall be six years and no such official shall serve for more than two consecutive terms.”
In conclusion, Senator Robin Padilla and Congressman Rufus Rodriguez should be thrilled that they can now proceed with their committee hearings totally focused on reform work. But they should also shed themselves of the hubris which killed past Cha-Cha attempts by adopting a more strategic mindset. Pursuing a well-defined reform objective is a viable roadmap for our first shot at reforming the 1987 Constitution.
Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Resolution seeking charter change reaches House plenary, faces scrutinyOpposition lawmakers question the timing and necessity of amending or revising the 1987 Constitution now.
Read more »
Cha-cha not dependent on president's endorsement —PadillaAmending the 1987 Constitution is not dependent on the endorsement of the sitting president, Senator Robin Padilla, one of the proponents of Charter change in the Senate, said Wednesday.
Read more »
Abante accuses UP Gender Law head of bias over 'legal statement' on SOGIE billThe brouhaha starts after a religious leader argued against the need for a SOGIE bill, claiming that the 1987 Constitution already protects all Filipinos.
Read more »
House opens debates on resolution for Con-con | Jovee Marie de la CruzTHE House of Representatives on Wednesday started the plenary debates on Resolution of Both Houses 6 calling for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments to the 1987 Constitution. In his sponsorship speech, House Committee on Constitutional Amendments Chairman Rufus Rodriguez said Congress cannot turn its back from the “truth and…
Read more »
[OPINION] Mother Tongue-based education and our Indigenous Peoples'As it provides opportunities for Indigenous learners to freely speak and learn the language that reflects their own community, MTB-MLE provides for developed self-identity and increased self-esteem, which are important in the practice of indigineity.'
Read more »
[OPINION] Is Marcos in full command of defense, military establishments?In this ThoughtLeaders piece, Rappler executive editor Glenda M. Gloria takes us through the messy transition at the defense-military leadership. What gives, Mr. President?
Read more »