KUALA LUMPUR: The Sessions Court here has allowed an application by Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli to obtain documents regarding Tan Sri Shahril Shamsuddin's remuneration and incentive package paid by the company during his tenure as Sapura Energy Bhd chief executive officer.
Judge Lailatul Zuraida Harron@Haron ordered the company to produce the documents sought by Rafizi within one month from today .
"The next case management is fixed on May 15, namely to update the court in respect of the company’s compliance with the court's decision for production of the said documents,” said Navpreet. In the discovery application, Rafizi sought the court's permission for Sapura Energy to reveal Shahril's remuneration and incentive package.
Philippines Latest News, Philippines Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ex-CEO’s salary: Sapura Energy ordered to give Rafizi documentsMinister seeking to strengthen his case in the defamation suit.
Read more »
High Court dismisses Shafee's bid to initiate counterclaim against LHDNKUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has dismissed lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah's leave application to initiate a counterclaim against the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) over RM9.41mil in alleged tax arrears.
Read more »
Report: High Court moots mediation first as Zahid, Dr Mahathir sue each other for defamationKUALA LUMPUR, April 14 — The High Court has suggested that Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad undergo mediation...
Read more »
FGV units sued for RM25mil over fraud, trespass claims on Sabah landFGV units sued for RM25mil over fraud, trespass claims on Sabah land FMTNews FMTBusiness
Read more »
Muda seeks court declaration MACC has no power to probe SRC judgeOriginating summons was filed at High Court two days ago, says counsel.
Read more »
Shafee fails in bid to file counterclaim against IRB | The Malaysian InsightHigh Court dismisses application on grounds lawyer is not entitled to do so.
Read more »